<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nth Root of N</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/</link>
	<description>... dodging grues in the dark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idan</title>
		<link>http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Idan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nealabq.com/blog/?p=1333#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I ran across a problem in my calculus book,
which asks to find the supremum of &quot;nth root of n&quot;
for natural values. I think the upper bound in this case should be 3^(1/3),am i right ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across a problem in my calculus book,<br />
which asks to find the supremum of &#8220;nth root of n&#8221;<br />
for natural values. I think the upper bound in this case should be 3^(1/3),am i right ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jick</title>
		<link>http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nealabq.com/blog/?p=1333#comment-136</guid>
		<description>You might enjoy what I call the Whammo Function, W(x), so called for its behavior for x  0.  On the reals you can define it using logarithms, as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might enjoy what I call the Whammo Function, W(x), so called for its behavior for x  0.  On the reals you can define it using logarithms, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bas latex</title>
		<link>http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>bas latex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nealabq.com/blog/?p=1333#comment-125</guid>
		<description>L&#039;auteur de ce jour dans notre magasin pour acheter un latexcatsuits pièce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L&#8217;auteur de ce jour dans notre magasin pour acheter un latexcatsuits pièce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://nealabq.com/blog/2010/06/07/nth-root-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nealabq.com/blog/?p=1333#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Hayabusa, glad to help!

Peter, wow, excellent comment. I&#039;ve read it 4 times so far, and I think I get it now. Thanks for taking the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hayabusa, glad to help!</p>
<p>Peter, wow, excellent comment. I&#8217;ve read it 4 times so far, and I think I get it now. Thanks for taking the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

